广东11选5人工8码计划:What we know about human evolution may soon be turned on its head

NEW discoveries hint humans did not evolve to trek out of Africa. That honour may belong to someone, or something, else.

Jamie Seidel
News Corp Australia NetworkJuly 17, 20182:46pm

New Human Ancestor Discovered: Homo naledi - Promo -National Geographic3:30

New Human Ancestor Discovered: Homo naledi - Promo -National Geographic.

The story about our origins has become a whole lot more complex, with new discoveries in Africa and China. Picture: 2001 A Space OdysseySource:Supplied

THE idea goes that modern Homo sapiens — that’s us — evolved as an isolated community in Africa some 500,000 years ago. We then upped tools and trekked across the world, pushing Neanderthals aside as we went.

Turns out, that may not be quite right.

No, we’ve not found the imposing black monolith from the famous 2001: A Space Odyssey.

But some recent finds are no less significant.

“A few years ago, it seemed all too easy,” writes University of New South Wales Dr Darren Curnoe. “The matter was settled. Homo sapiens had evolved in the East African rift valley roughly 200,000 years ago and exited the mother continent to settle the remaining planet around 60,000 years ago.

“As someone who’s kept a keen eye on developments in, and indeed actively researching, our evolution, it’s clear to me that there’s something’s going on here. Change is in the wind!”

Part of this upset of established ideas is a new discovery in China.

On the cliff face in the north-central China state of Shangchen, a scattering of stone-age tools have been recovered.

They’re more than 2 million years old, their discoverers report in Nature.

Until now, the oldest known evidence of human ancestors — in this case Homo erectus — outside Africa was in Georgia, Eastern Europe. That dates back to about 1.85 million years — almost immediately after the species appeared in Africa.

But 96 stone blades, flakes and cores used to carve up antelope, deer and pigs in China’s Loess Plateau has upset the timeline.

They indicate hominins — the family that includes humans and our ancestors — got out of Africa at least a quarter of a million years earlier than thought, and occupied Shangchen on and off for more than 850,000 years.

Now, one argument goes, this indicates one of our more adventurous ancestors — Homo erectus — did not itself evolve in Africa.

Instead, Homo erectus is possibly an amalgam of diverse branches of earlier homominims that had already spread through Africa, Europe and Asia.

It’s an idea that emerges even as the origins of ourselves — Homo sapiens — falls under the spotlight.

At some point before Homo sapiens emerged from Africa, earlier tribes of hominins had already settled — and begun evolving separately — throughout Eurasia. Pictur: National Geographic

At some point before Homo sapiens emerged from Africa, earlier tribes of hominins had already settled — and begun evolving separately — throughout Eurasia. Pictur: National GeographicSource:Supplied


More than two million years ago, our ancestors appear to have already conquered the world.

The new finds suggest this was at least 250,000 years earlier than previously thought.

Geologist Zhaoyu Zhu of the Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry at the Chinese Academy of Sciences was careful. He spent years checking and rechecking dates for the layers of sediments in which the tools were embedded.

Study co-author Professor Dennell of the University of Exeter said: “Our discovery means it is necessary now to reconsider the timing of when early humans left Africa”.

RELATED: How men almost went extinct 7000 years ago

Previously, the oldest evidence of hominin activity in Asia were fossils and stone tools dating back between 1.5 and 1.7 million years. This includes part of a Homo erectus skull found just 4km from the new tool site.

Despite pushing back the date of hominid expansion, it also indicates they were much more hardy than believed.

The site in which the long-term settlement was found had experienced severe temperature fluctuations during that time — from intense heat to freezing cold.

And while early hominins had not yet evolved our long legs, bigger brains nor developed advanced tools such as hand axes — they thrived.

RELATED: The Shigir idol … is this our original god?

There is as yet no evidence of the exact hominid species that produced the Shangchen stone tools. In fact, if made by Homo erectus, it would mean the species evolved in China before it did Africa.

This adds fresh weight to what has until now been a fringe theory: that a more primitive species of hominin than Homo erectus had escaped Africa much earlier — and that Homo erectus evolved in Eurasia, later to recolonise the homelands of its forefathers.

Our knowledge of the thickly entwined evolutionary ‘bush’ that led to homo sapiens is stillmissing many branches, fronds and links.

Our knowledge of the thickly entwined evolutionary ‘bush’ that led to homo sapiens is stillmissing many branches, fronds and links.Source:Supplied


Dr Curno writes that other recent discoveries indicate our species — Homo sapiens — first emerged in Africa some 315,000 years ago. They appeared in southern China some 139,000 years ago.

We know from genetic analysis that, along the way, we interbred with Neanderthals. We cavorted with a mysterious second species — the Denisovans. And there may have been a third, as yet unidentified, romantic interlude.

RELATED: Would we know if there was civilisation before humans?

Even so, the makeup of Homo sapiens is looking somewhat complex.

“We’ve also begun to find humans whose physical traits don’t fit with our preconceived notions of what sapiens should look like, such as the Iwo Eleru, Nazlet Khater and Red Deer Cave people surviving quite late in various parts of Africa and in Asia,” Dr Curno says.

“So profound is the shift underway in human origins science that it’s seen the unusual step of a team of 23 researchers … publish today’s new synthesis of the evidence — and in doing so embrace the emerging picture of complexity and ditch the old simplistic ideas.”

He’s referring to another new study, led by Eleanor Scerri of the University of Oxford, published in the journal Trends in Ecology & Evolution:Did Our Species Evolve in Subdivided Populations across Africa, and Why Does It Matter?

Here, the researchers argue we did not evolve from a single population from a single region of Africa.

Instead, we’re a hybrid of separate hominid populations that had spread out only to merge into one new species much later.

Researchers have determined that much of human DNA comes from Neanderthals, and at least two other hominid species. Picture: National Geographic

Researchers have determined that much of human DNA comes from Neanderthals, and at least two other hominid species. Picture: National GeographicSource:Supplied


We know that Neanderthals and Homo sapiens began to diverge from a common ancestor about half a million years ago.

Only around 300,000 years ago did early homo sapiens (people) actually begin to have features that made them look like humans, Dr Scerri said.

But, even then, “all the fossils between 300,000 years ago and about 100,000 years ago don’t really look like anyone living today,” Scerri told Live science .

Some populations had small faces. Others had prominent chins. Still more had globular skulls and small teeth.

But, while common to all of us now, none of these features were then found in a single individual.

“These features tend to be distributed across the early fossils in different combinations with different, what we call, more primitive or archaic features that we don’t see in anyone living today,” Scerri says.

It was only through occasional meetings between different groups between 100,000 and 400,000 years ago that brought all these modern traits together.

EXPLORE MORE: What the archaeology of Star Wars teaches us of ourselves

“Which means, of course, that evolution probably progressed at a different speed and tempo in different regions of Africa as different groups came into contact with each other at different times,” Scerri says.

Dr Curno says this raises the question: what is a Homo sapiens anyway?

“Does this mean they aren’t our forebears? Not necessarily, just that our current approach is pretty limited and we need to keep in mind that our earliest ancestors would have looked, well, ancestral!,” he writes.

Leave a comment

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please . Don't have an account? Sign up

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Jump back to top

MORE IN science

  • 没人否定土地价值,这个价值应该合理吧?房价收入比应该合理吧?退一万步,土地收入应该回归土地,如公租房吧?挤占其他经济部门不合理吧? 2019-02-23
  • 天山特克斯峡谷 中国国家地理网 2019-02-23
  • 浙财大推送电子毕业账单,饱含温情 2019-02-22
  • 消除“毒跑道”,关键在标准 2019-02-22
  • 牢记历史使命 投身农村基层 在打赢脱贫攻坚战中展示新作为 2019-02-21
  • 随处可见的“艾草”究竟有何用?了解它才知道它珍贵 2019-02-20
  • 当之无愧的代言人(微言) 2019-02-19
  • 阳煤投入10.5亿打造“碧水蓝天” 2019-02-19
  • 保障安全出行 面对“黑车”坚决说不! 2019-02-18
  • 内蒙古巴彦淖尔市草原旱情严重 2019-02-18
  • 巢湖玉泉小区大爷大妈在绿化带种菜还浇粪水 2019-02-17
  • [鄙视]就你这智商还挑战爱因斯坦?蚍蜉撼树也! 2019-02-17
  • 十省发布公告:高考理综全国I卷第8题选A或B均给6分 2019-02-16
  • 大运河文化带非遗大展已接待5.6万人次观众 2019-02-15
  • “沪喀号”首架旅游援疆包机抵达喀什 2019-02-14
  • 290| 756| 560| 702| 277| 269| 133| 825| 863| 447|